- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Tuesday, June 01, 2010

Drunk off duty cops beat up son of detective - getting better work stories


Accused officers deny charges
Two off-duty police officers accused of forcing their way into an apartment building and attacking several students during a night out have appeared in court to fight the allegations.

The two Auckland City constables, Patrick Garty, 32, and Wiremu Bowers-Rakatau, 21, were both charged with assault in August last year after an incident on St Patrick's Day.

Garty faces three charges of assault and Bowers-Rakatau faces one charge of assault. They are also jointly charged with a further assault count.

They both denied the charges at the start of their defended hearing at the Auckland District Court this morning.

A third police officer, Chris Renata, 31, faces a single charge of common assault. He denies the charge and will take part in a separate defended hearing later this year.


God I love this story - why? Because what the article doesn't point out is that the kid these dumb drunk off duty cops beat up was the son of a Detective! Oh the irony huh? The only reason these off duty cops are getting prosecuted is because they were dumb enough to beat the crap out of the son of a Detective, normally off duty cops would’ve been able to get away with bashing teens up, but beat up the son of a Detective and there’s hell to pay.

Eye-rollingly hilarious

13 Comments:

At 2/6/10 11:29 am, Anonymous Dex said...

If cops are breath testing off-duty cops and charging them what on earth gives you any grounds to suggest they wouldn't act in a case like this especially when it involves so many independent witnesses.

Your clueless Bomber and this whole 80's conspiracy, blue brother hood etc stigma your still desperately trying to propagate just makes you look like a naive little kid with his head in a box.

 
At 2/6/10 12:30 pm, Blogger Bomber said...

Really Dex, because the cops certainly had a time coming down on those two drunk detectives on New Years Day didn't they?

As for your contention that the kid getting smashed up being the son of a detective has NOTHING to do with this prosecution going ahead, well that's up to the public to decide isn't it Dex?

We can all believe the Police are wonderful like you obviously do, or we can look at a situation like this and have a giggle, because I'm pretty sure the fact the kid these dumb off duty cops smashed up being a detective is pretty much the only reason this is being prosecuted,. Why? Because I've seen first hand many examples of cops getting away with this type of behaviour when it's aimed at people without such family links.

I'm afraid your apologist position for the police is the only naive little kid thinking here Dex.

 
At 2/6/10 1:22 pm, Anonymous Dex said...

You clearly have absolutely no clue outside of your own little conspiracy world Bomber.

The Police come down harder on their own than any other group and often prosecute with a lower evidential basis of culpablility on the basis of letting the courts decide and being seen to be impartial.

Ask any lawyer or someone involved in the Justice system whether this case is only coming to court because of the family links of the victim and they will laugh in your face.

 
At 2/6/10 1:43 pm, Blogger Bomber said...

The Police come down harder on their own than any other group and often prosecute with a lower evidential basis of culpablility on the basis of letting the courts decide and being seen to be impartial.

Cough, cough.

 
At 2/6/10 7:13 pm, Anonymous Dex said...

Thanks for providing an almost exact example of what I was talking about Bomber, very gracious of you. Either that or it was a rather unintentional case of self-ownage.

A very clear case where the Police have charged their own using a lower evidential basis for the precise reasons I outlined. A QC, completely and utterly independent of the Police then stated that the off-duty cops behaviour did not meet the test of disorderly behaviour and that he shouldn't have been charged by the Police in the first place.

 
At 2/6/10 9:07 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Police come down harder on their own than any other group and often prosecute with a lower evidential basis of culpablility on the basis of letting the courts decide and being seen to be impartial.






Um, did you just make that up?!

 
At 2/6/10 11:04 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

A QC, completely and utterly independent of the Police then stated that the off-duty cops behaviour did not meet the test of disorderly behaviour and that he shouldn't have been charged by the Police in the first place.

Yeah, right...

 
At 3/6/10 12:42 am, Blogger Bomber said...

GRIN - And Dex had the audacity of calling me naive. I think readers have responded to what they make of your claims Dex.

Don't you love what those kids were screaming on the 111 phone call as the drunk off duty cop bashed him again and again.

 
At 3/6/10 6:11 am, Blogger Bomber said...

And as for the link I use backing your claim that the Police deal harsher on their own, you obviously don't seem to understand the details of that story.

Let's go through them - 2 very drunk off duty detectives on New Years Day approach a mother and her 11 year old son in a car and demand to see her ID. She points out she has no intention of doing that and that one of the Detectives zipper is open. This prompts the drunk off duty detective to then take his penis out of his pants Dex and smear it all over the car window. The mother and son escape the car to a petrol station where they ironically call the Police.

Uniformed Officer turn up and try and ask the two drunk off duty Detectives to please leave the situation calmly and quietly. The two drunk off duty detectives REFUSE TO. So the uniformed Police then call the senior officer at Papakura to come in and try and talk these two drunk off duty detectives down, the Senior Officer tries, they still don't, the two drunk off duty THEN get arrested.

Now according to Dex, this story is just another example of how much harder the Police are on their own and how dare I even suggest that this current case (where drunk off duty cops beat the shit out of the son of a Detective) is only being prosecuted because these dumb drunk off duty cops attacked the son of a detective.

Really? Let's just ask ourselves a pretty simple question - If ANYONE of us had harassed a mother and her son in a car on New Years Day and had taken our penis out and drunkenly smeared it across their car window and then had refused to leave them alone - would the NZ Police have asked you nicely to leave, then call in the senior Officer at Papakura to come down to try and ask you to leave again? Not fucking likely, how many of us would have been asked nicely to leave or would we have been arrested the second the uniformed Police turn up?

Remember Dex is holding up both these cases as evidence that the Police are harder on their own.

 
At 3/6/10 7:44 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dex just walk away you've lost your mind and your argument.

Police abusing their positions is extremely common please get out of the 50's and wake up.

 
At 3/6/10 8:35 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So lets get this straight.

You are saying that this QC is corrupt, and in the pay of corrupt police, right bomber?

And you would be able to prove this, using hard facts, as opposed to anecdotes, right bomber?

Then you should approach the MSM, and blow the lid on our corrupt police and corrupt lawyers.

Because if you don't, perhaps it's because it's bullshit.

Oh, and if I harrased a women without any impartial witnesses, then it's her word against mine.
Those cases are very hard to prosecute.

 
At 3/6/10 11:03 am, Anonymous LGS said...

Hey anon maybe when the police have a huge budget to counter act any kind of indecent charge against them it makes it hard to 'blow the lid' on the police.

Think about it, only if you had a lot of money and time to waste showing how unjust they are you would need some huge reward at the end.

There's countless proof for example that our govt are bunch of liars and they are definitely corrupt, we all know this, so who would stand up against them and why should it be any single person's responsibility to do so.

Bomber is sharing his opinion he doesn't need to waste his time proving anything we see it everyday in the news.

And unless you were born yesterday lawyers and police worldwide are not the best people to trust for their honesty wake up already and get out of your dream fairy world.

 
At 3/6/10 9:24 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

if Louise Wallaces trial by police is anything to go by with all shes suffered then i do think the

the police have a huge budget to counter act any kind of indecent charge against them it makes it hard to 'blow the lid' on the police.



is 100% correct, i mean, would you after seeing what she went through

 

Post a Comment

<< Home