So the war between Cameron Slater and David Fisher just went nuclear. Cameron has been throwing baseless verbal feces at Fisher like a deranged chimp in a concrete zoo for sometime now. The reason for all this verbose animosity is because Slater is Judith Collin's favorite attack dog/pet and Fisher has angered the Government with his very sharp Kim Dotcom journalism.
Sadly starting a war with someone like Fisher is best done with a sledge hammer between the eyes, because if you don't take him out in the first shot, you're screwed.
And so it comes to pass.
Slater is one of the best propagandists in the game who constantly twists issues to add some level of self-rightous moralizing in on top of his outrage. This time Slater is attacking the HoS because he claims their addition to a paragraph about Paul Holme's drinking issues in their editorial made them hypocrites because the editor had suggested to Slater he leaves the personal stuff out now he is an editor.
Gloriously David Fisher tweeted an old 2009 post by Slater where he bewilderingly claims Holmes was trying to buy drugs?!?!?!?! That he gets caught out hypocritically attacking others for a hypocrisy he himself gleefully partook in is pure joy.
So when Slater was alleging Holmes was buying drugs, that was fine. But when the HoS mentioned one paragraph about Paul's personal problems with booze and relationships that's the worst kind of hypocrisy???
How does he get away with this?
Hoisted by his own harpoon again.